Your writing style is analytical, informative, and engaging. Here's a breakdown of the characteristics I observed:
1. **Conversational Tone**: You begin with a question, which immediately engages the reader and sets the tone for a discussion rather than a one-sided monologue.
2. **Contrast and Comparison**: You effectively juxtapose human abilities with AI, setting a context for the reader. This technique helps in emphasizing the unique qualities of the human brain.
3. **Historical Context**: By referencing the Torrence Tests of Creativity and its origin in the mid 20th Century, you provide historical context. This adds depth to your argument and showcases your knowledge on the subject.
4. **Practical Examples**: You don't just talk about abstract concepts; you give tangible examples. The tasks from the Torrence Tests and the Remote Associates Test (RAT) example make your points more relatable and easier to understand.
5. **Interactive Engagement**: By presenting a RAT challenge to the reader ("land, goat, city"), you're inviting them to participate actively, making your writing more engaging.
6. **Focus on Solutions**: Instead of just discussing problems or challenges, you provide solutions and alternatives. For instance, you suggest using the Torrence Tests as exercises and emphasize the importance of estimation.
7. **Clarity and Structure**: Your writing is structured in a way that each paragraph introduces a new idea or expands on the previous one. This makes it easy for readers to follow your train of thought.
8. **Personal Touch**: Phrases like "I would make it more complex" and "My favorite is" add a personal touch to your writing, making it more relatable.
9. **Conclusion with a Practical Tool**: Ending with a mention of an Excel workbook that teaches estimation provides readers with a tangible next step or resource, rounding off your piece effectively.
Note: ChatGPT has been programmed to encourage conversation. It tends to look at things through rose colored glasses. I asked it to play Devi's Advocate, and you can see the critical review here.